DROPS

Document

DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2023.30

A Degree 4 Sum-Of-Squares Lower Bound for the Clique Number of the Paley Graph

Authors: Dmitriy Kunisky and Xifan Yu

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 264, 38th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2023)

Abstract

We prove that the degree 4 sum-of-squares (SOS) relaxation of the clique number of the Paley graph on a prime number p of vertices has value at least Ω(p^{1/3}). This is in contrast to the widely believed conjecture that the actual clique number of the Paley graph is O(polylog(p)). Our result may be viewed as a derandomization of that of Deshpande and Montanari (2015), who showed the same lower bound (up to polylog(p) terms) with high probability for the Erdős-Rényi random graph on p vertices, whose clique number is with high probability O(log(p)). We also show that our lower bound is optimal for the Feige-Krauthgamer construction of pseudomoments, derandomizing an argument of Kelner. Finally, we present numerical experiments indicating that the value of the degree 4 SOS relaxation of the Paley graph may scale as O(p^{1/2 - ε}) for some ε > 0, and give a matrix norm calculation indicating that the pseudocalibration construction for SOS lower bounds for random graphs will not immediately transfer to the Paley graph. Taken together, our results suggest that degree 4 SOS may break the "√p barrier" for upper bounds on the clique number of Paley graphs, but prove that it can at best improve the exponent from 1/2 to 1/3.

Cite as

Dmitriy Kunisky and Xifan Yu. A Degree 4 Sum-Of-Squares Lower Bound for the Clique Number of the Paley Graph. In 38th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2023). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 264, pp. 30:1-30:25, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2023)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{kunisky_et_al:LIPIcs.CCC.2023.30,
  author =	{Kunisky, Dmitriy and Yu, Xifan},
  title =	{{A Degree 4 Sum-Of-Squares Lower Bound for the Clique Number of the Paley Graph}},
  booktitle =	{38th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2023)},
  pages =	{30:1--30:25},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-282-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2023},
  volume =	{264},
  editor =	{Ta-Shma, Amnon},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2023.30},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-183008},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2023.30},
  annote =	{Keywords: convex optimization, sum of squares, Paley graph, derandomization}
}

Document

DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2020.78

Computational Hardness of Certifying Bounds on Constrained PCA Problems

Authors: Afonso S. Bandeira, Dmitriy Kunisky, and Alexander S. Wein

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 151, 11th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2020)

Abstract

Given a random n × n symmetric matrix ? drawn from the Gaussian orthogonal ensemble (GOE), we consider the problem of certifying an upper bound on the maximum value of the quadratic form ?^⊤ ? ? over all vectors ? in a constraint set ? ⊂ ℝⁿ. For a certain class of normalized constraint sets we show that, conditional on a certain complexity-theoretic conjecture, no polynomial-time algorithm can certify a better upper bound than the largest eigenvalue of ?. A notable special case included in our results is the hypercube ? = {±1/√n}ⁿ, which corresponds to the problem of certifying bounds on the Hamiltonian of the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick spin glass model from statistical physics. Our results suggest a striking gap between optimization and certification for this problem. Our proof proceeds in two steps. First, we give a reduction from the detection problem in the negatively-spiked Wishart model to the above certification problem. We then give evidence that this Wishart detection problem is computationally hard below the classical spectral threshold, by showing that no low-degree polynomial can (in expectation) distinguish the spiked and unspiked models. This method for predicting computational thresholds was proposed in a sequence of recent works on the sum-of-squares hierarchy, and is conjectured to be correct for a large class of problems. Our proof can be seen as constructing a distribution over symmetric matrices that appears computationally indistinguishable from the GOE, yet is supported on matrices whose maximum quadratic form over ? ∈ ? is much larger than that of a GOE matrix.

Cite as

Afonso S. Bandeira, Dmitriy Kunisky, and Alexander S. Wein. Computational Hardness of Certifying Bounds on Constrained PCA Problems. In 11th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2020). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 151, pp. 78:1-78:29, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2020)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bandeira_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2020.78,
  author =	{Bandeira, Afonso S. and Kunisky, Dmitriy and Wein, Alexander S.},
  title =	{{Computational Hardness of Certifying Bounds on Constrained PCA Problems}},
  booktitle =	{11th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2020)},
  pages =	{78:1--78:29},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-134-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2020},
  volume =	{151},
  editor =	{Vidick, Thomas},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2020.78},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-117633},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2020.78},
  annote =	{Keywords: Certification, Sherrington-Kirkpatrick model, spiked Wishart model, low-degree likelihood ratio}
}

Search Results

Documents authored by Kunisky, Dmitriy

A Degree 4 Sum-Of-Squares Lower Bound for the Clique Number of the Paley Graph

Abstract

Cite as

Computational Hardness of Certifying Bounds on Constrained PCA Problems

Abstract

Cite as

Thanks for your feedback!

Could not send message